Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 1999
147.96
+19.98 from 1998
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 147.96 in 1999, increased +19.98 from 153.40 in 1998. This was the 101st highest globally.
Global Ranking - 1999▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Russian Federation | 47.96 | -50.8% |
| 2nd | Slovak Republic | 52.28 | -1.1% |
| 3rd | Zambia | 58.20 | 0.1% |
| 4th | Moldova | 62.83 | -23.7% |
| 5th | Equatorial Guinea | 63.81 | -4.5% |
| 6th | Czechia | 66.00 | -0.9% |
| 7th | Bulgaria | 66.94 | 8.3% |
| 8th | Nigeria | 69.20 | -74.7% |
| 9th | Brazil | 70.97 | -56.6% |
| 10th | Trinidad and Tobago | 71.05 | 1.6% |
| 11th | Hungary | 72.51 | -12.3% |
| 12th | Romania | 72.66 | -14.8% |
| 13th | Armenia | 72.75 | -1.8% |
| 14th | Australia | 73.51 | -15.0% |
| 15th | Canada | 75.26 | -20.6% |
| 16th | Lithuania | 75.65 | 7.9% |
| 17th | Estonia | 77.10 | 4.2% |
| 18th | Samoa | 78.13 | -6.1% |
| 19th | Georgia | 78.46 | -14.4% |
| 20th | Indonesia | 78.82 | 42.7% |
| 21st | Papua New Guinea | 80.47 | -9.3% |
| 22nd | United Arab Emirates | 81.15 | -0.4% |
| 23rd | Poland | 83.34 | -10.1% |
| 24th | Thailand | 83.83 | 3.7% |
| 25th | New Zealand | 84.80 | -5.9% |
| 26th | Ireland | 85.57 | -14.5% |
| 27th | India | 86.80 | -1.6% |
| 28th | Latvia | 88.61 | 12.5% |
| 29th | Peru | 89.50 | -10.0% |
| 30th | Colombia | 89.90 | -30.0% |
| 31st | Guyana | 89.92 | -10.0% |
| 32nd | Croatia | 90.01 | -10.1% |
| 33rd | Central African Republic | 90.17 | -4.3% |
| 34th | Costa Rica | 90.25 | -2.5% |
| 35th | Spain | 90.38 | -3.5% |
| 36th | Greece | 91.43 | -11.8% |
| 37th | Norway | 91.49 | -22.0% |
| 38th | Côte d'Ivoire | 91.54 | -1.1% |
| 39th | Malta | 92.51 | -3.4% |
| 40th | China | 92.68 | 18.4% |
| 41st | Cyprus | 93.77 | -9.7% |
| 42nd | Togo | 94.05 | -4.3% |
| 43rd | Switzerland | 94.75 | 6.0% |
| 44th | Luxembourg | 95.00 | -1.2% |
| 45th | Portugal | 95.44 | -2.5% |
| 46th | Denmark | 96.75 | 1.2% |
| 47th | Belgium | 97.02 | 0.3% |
| 48th | Malaysia | 97.25 | -12.6% |
| 49th | Netherlands | 97.41 | -0.3% |
| 50th | Italy | 97.99 | -6.3% |
| 51st | Ukraine | 98.39 | -21.1% |
| 52nd | Singapore | 98.67 | -0.8% |
| 53rd | Dominican Republic | 98.99 | -3.6% |
| 54th | Korea | 99.29 | 19.7% |
| 55th | Cameroon | 99.36 | -1.1% |
| 56th | Slovenia | 99.59 | -0.2% |
| 57th | Philippines | 100.36 | 24.4% |
| 58th | Austria | 101.50 | 1.7% |
| 59th | Gabon | 102.04 | -4.7% |
| 60th | France | 102.53 | -7.9% |
| 61st | North Macedonia | 102.89 | 1.9% |
| 62nd | South Africa | 103.72 | -27.9% |
| 63rd | St. Kitts and Nevis | 104.22 | 1.5% |
| 64th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 105.03 | 0.1% |
| 65th | Paraguay | 105.03 | 3.1% |
| 66th | Finland | 105.39 | -1.3% |
| 67th | St. Lucia | 105.93 | 0.9% |
| 68th | Mexico | 106.79 | -15.5% |
| 69th | Israel | 106.81 | 8.1% |
| 70th | Germany | 106.91 | -5.8% |
| 71st | Chile | 107.34 | -16.5% |
| 72nd | Solomon Islands | 108.91 | 3.7% |
| 73rd | Grenada | 109.31 | 0.8% |
| 74th | Fiji | 109.52 | 0.1% |
| 75th | Pakistan | 109.82 | -7.5% |
| 76th | Nicaragua | 111.46 | 4.0% |
| 77th | Morocco | 112.26 | 3.6% |
| 78th | Belize | 112.47 | 0.6% |
| 79th | Sweden | 113.83 | -14.0% |
| 80th | Uruguay | 114.44 | 5.0% |
| 81st | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 114.94 | 3.0% |
| 82nd | Bahamas, The | 115.21 | -2.4% |
| 83rd | United States | 115.57 | 17.3% |
| 84th | Serbia | 116.10 | 21.0% |
| 85th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 116.53 | -0.2% |
| 86th | Antigua and Barbuda | 116.99 | -2.1% |
| 87th | Ghana | 117.85 | -8.2% |
| 88th | Japan | 118.90 | -13.0% |
| 89th | Burundi | 119.40 | -17.7% |
| 90th | Dominica | 119.69 | -0.6% |
| 91st | Saudi Arabia | 123.29 | 19.3% |
| 92nd | Uganda | 123.40 | -9.0% |
| 93rd | Algeria | 125.23 | -15.3% |
| 94th | Bahrain | 126.38 | -2.9% |
| 95th | United Kingdom | 129.12 | -1.9% |
| 96th | Malawi | 129.70 | 0.5% |
| 97th | Türkiye | 130.32 | 5.0% |
| 98th | Tunisia | 132.70 | 0.7% |
| 99th | Iceland | 133.48 | 26.0% |
| 100th | Sierra Leone | 142.58 | 18.5% |
| 101st | Hong Kong SAR, China | 147.96 | 15.6% |
| 102nd | Lesotho | 150.66 | -8.4% |
| 103rd | Gambia, The | 192.06 | -2.3% |
| 104th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 219.45 | 21.4% |
| 105th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 368.21 | 54.2% |
| 106th | Argentina | 478.78 | 9.8% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1999?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1999 was 147.96. This ranked 101st globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 1999?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 15.6% in 1999 compared to 1998.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1999?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1999 at 478.78.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1999?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1999 was 147.96. This ranked 101st globally.
How does 1999 compare to 1998 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 153.40 in 1998 to 147.96 in 1999, a 15.6% increase.
Related
1998
2000
All years
Full ranking 1999
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking