Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000
146.69
+27.90 from 1999
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 146.69 in 2000, increased +27.90 from 147.96 in 1999. This was the 101st highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2000▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Russian Federation | 54.06 | -13.1% |
| 2nd | Slovak Republic | 57.55 | 11.2% |
| 3rd | Zambia | 59.75 | 2.7% |
| 4th | Equatorial Guinea | 61.21 | -4.1% |
| 5th | Czechia | 67.05 | 3.1% |
| 6th | Bulgaria | 69.12 | 8.6% |
| 7th | Nigeria | 70.16 | 1.4% |
| 8th | Australia | 70.44 | -19.0% |
| 9th | Trinidad and Tobago | 72.65 | 2.2% |
| 10th | Hungary | 73.01 | -13.5% |
| 11th | Moldova | 73.14 | 16.4% |
| 12th | Armenia | 73.99 | 1.7% |
| 13th | Estonia | 74.58 | -3.3% |
| 14th | Samoa | 74.68 | -4.4% |
| 15th | Canada | 75.63 | -19.4% |
| 16th | Indonesia | 76.49 | -3.0% |
| 17th | Brazil | 76.53 | -29.5% |
| 18th | New Zealand | 77.02 | -10.0% |
| 19th | Thailand | 80.37 | -4.1% |
| 20th | Colombia | 81.44 | -30.0% |
| 21st | Romania | 81.74 | 11.2% |
| 22nd | Lithuania | 81.86 | 8.2% |
| 23rd | Ireland | 82.00 | -15.0% |
| 24th | United Arab Emirates | 84.76 | 4.5% |
| 25th | Greece | 85.16 | -18.3% |
| 26th | Georgia | 85.20 | 8.6% |
| 27th | Ghana | 86.02 | -27.0% |
| 28th | Côte d'Ivoire | 86.57 | -5.4% |
| 29th | Central African Republic | 87.31 | -3.2% |
| 30th | Papua New Guinea | 88.33 | 9.8% |
| 31st | Spain | 88.46 | -5.4% |
| 32nd | Norway | 89.45 | -24.1% |
| 33rd | Croatia | 89.63 | -6.9% |
| 34th | Togo | 89.83 | -4.5% |
| 35th | Peru | 90.17 | 0.7% |
| 36th | Malta | 90.44 | -4.9% |
| 37th | India | 90.88 | 4.7% |
| 38th | Cyprus | 91.15 | -10.3% |
| 39th | Philippines | 91.59 | 7.4% |
| 40th | Poland | 91.69 | 1.8% |
| 41st | Costa Rica | 92.14 | 2.1% |
| 42nd | Switzerland | 92.31 | 4.5% |
| 43rd | Netherlands | 92.60 | -4.2% |
| 44th | China | 92.76 | 24.7% |
| 45th | Denmark | 92.76 | -2.9% |
| 46th | Belgium | 93.03 | -2.3% |
| 47th | Portugal | 93.15 | -4.9% |
| 48th | Luxembourg | 93.17 | -2.3% |
| 49th | Italy | 93.19 | -10.0% |
| 50th | Latvia | 93.66 | 7.4% |
| 51st | Cameroon | 93.67 | -5.7% |
| 52nd | Guyana | 94.22 | 4.8% |
| 53rd | Gabon | 96.22 | -5.7% |
| 54th | France | 97.09 | -10.5% |
| 55th | Slovenia | 97.38 | -2.2% |
| 56th | Ukraine | 97.74 | -0.7% |
| 57th | Austria | 98.34 | -0.1% |
| 58th | Malaysia | 98.51 | -12.7% |
| 59th | Singapore | 98.51 | 5.7% |
| 60th | Germany | 99.70 | -9.8% |
| 61st | Finland | 100.00 | -5.5% |
| 62nd | South Africa | 100.56 | -25.5% |
| 63rd | Paraguay | 101.75 | -3.1% |
| 64th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 102.68 | -2.2% |
| 65th | Dominican Republic | 103.48 | 4.5% |
| 66th | Korea | 104.73 | 10.6% |
| 67th | North Macedonia | 105.49 | 9.4% |
| 68th | Fiji | 106.12 | -3.1% |
| 69th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 106.34 | 2.0% |
| 70th | Chile | 106.48 | -12.6% |
| 71st | Pakistan | 107.91 | -1.7% |
| 72nd | Nicaragua | 109.93 | -1.4% |
| 73rd | Sweden | 111.20 | -14.1% |
| 74th | St. Lucia | 111.60 | 5.4% |
| 75th | Grenada | 111.86 | 2.3% |
| 76th | Israel | 112.56 | 18.6% |
| 77th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 113.09 | -1.6% |
| 78th | Uruguay | 113.35 | -0.9% |
| 79th | Solomon Islands | 113.44 | 4.2% |
| 80th | Belize | 114.19 | 1.5% |
| 81st | Antigua and Barbuda | 114.66 | -2.0% |
| 82nd | Morocco | 114.85 | 5.0% |
| 83rd | Mexico | 115.56 | -16.4% |
| 84th | Uganda | 116.98 | -5.2% |
| 85th | Bahamas, The | 117.11 | 1.6% |
| 86th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 117.67 | 1.0% |
| 87th | Algeria | 119.33 | -12.7% |
| 88th | United States | 119.47 | 22.6% |
| 89th | Dominica | 120.37 | 0.6% |
| 90th | Burundi | 123.75 | 3.6% |
| 91st | Saudi Arabia | 124.78 | 25.5% |
| 92nd | Japan | 125.52 | -18.2% |
| 93rd | Bahrain | 129.22 | 2.3% |
| 94th | United Kingdom | 130.44 | -0.6% |
| 95th | Sierra Leone | 130.89 | -8.2% |
| 96th | Tunisia | 131.02 | -1.3% |
| 97th | Malawi | 134.23 | 3.5% |
| 98th | Iceland | 137.25 | 26.0% |
| 99th | Lesotho | 142.86 | -5.2% |
| 100th | Türkiye | 145.32 | 11.5% |
| 101st | Hong Kong SAR, China | 146.69 | 23.5% |
| 102nd | Serbia | 167.21 | 44.0% |
| 103rd | Gambia, The | 183.59 | -4.4% |
| 104th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 260.48 | 18.7% |
| 105th | Argentina | 475.41 | -0.7% |
| 106th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 510.87 | 38.7% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2000?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2000 was 146.69. This ranked 101st globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2000?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 23.5% in 2000 compared to 1999.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2000?▾
Congo, Democratic Republic of had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2000 at 510.87.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2000?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2000 was 146.69. This ranked 101st globally.
How does 2000 compare to 1999 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 147.96 in 1999 to 146.69 in 2000, a 23.5% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Hong Kong SAR, China matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 2000. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). View full analysis →
Related
1999
2001
All years
Full ranking 2000
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking