Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2012
104.37
+26.61 from 2011
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 104.37 in 2012, increased +26.61 from 97.97 in 2011. This was the 77th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2012▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Malawi | 78.50 | -18.9% |
| 2nd | Ghana | 88.23 | -6.8% |
| 3rd | Serbia | 88.64 | -7.2% |
| 4th | United Arab Emirates | 88.86 | 1.6% |
| 5th | Gambia, The | 88.99 | -3.8% |
| 6th | Thailand | 90.95 | 0.4% |
| 7th | Brazil | 91.99 | -47.2% |
| 8th | South Africa | 92.43 | -33.8% |
| 9th | India | 92.60 | -6.3% |
| 10th | Estonia | 93.15 | -1.0% |
| 11th | Lithuania | 93.34 | -1.1% |
| 12th | Gabon | 94.78 | -3.4% |
| 13th | Armenia | 95.06 | -4.8% |
| 14th | Germany | 95.24 | -6.7% |
| 15th | Malta | 95.24 | -7.5% |
| 16th | Morocco | 95.38 | -1.3% |
| 17th | Lesotho | 95.40 | -4.3% |
| 18th | Croatia | 95.41 | -8.3% |
| 19th | Dominica | 95.53 | 0.4% |
| 20th | Ireland | 95.63 | -15.6% |
| 21st | Poland | 95.68 | -10.2% |
| 22nd | Bahrain | 95.70 | 2.8% |
| 23rd | Israel | 95.98 | 7.2% |
| 24th | France | 96.01 | -8.4% |
| 25th | Dominican Republic | 96.33 | -0.1% |
| 26th | Tunisia | 96.38 | -1.5% |
| 27th | Togo | 96.39 | -4.3% |
| 28th | Cameroon | 96.43 | -3.8% |
| 29th | Romania | 96.58 | -7.4% |
| 30th | Mexico | 96.62 | -24.7% |
| 31st | Denmark | 96.67 | -4.6% |
| 32nd | Netherlands | 96.69 | -2.0% |
| 33rd | Belize | 96.98 | 1.7% |
| 34th | Finland | 96.99 | -4.3% |
| 35th | Hungary | 97.03 | -16.9% |
| 36th | Côte d'Ivoire | 97.31 | -4.8% |
| 37th | United States | 97.37 | 21.5% |
| 38th | Cyprus | 97.37 | -11.5% |
| 39th | Nicaragua | 97.43 | 1.6% |
| 40th | Central African Republic | 97.45 | -1.0% |
| 41st | Greece | 97.49 | -14.7% |
| 42nd | Grenada | 97.71 | 0.7% |
| 43rd | Italy | 97.75 | -6.8% |
| 44th | Spain | 97.97 | -5.9% |
| 45th | Austria | 98.39 | 1.6% |
| 46th | Czechia | 98.41 | -4.0% |
| 47th | Belgium | 98.48 | -1.0% |
| 48th | Luxembourg | 98.80 | -1.8% |
| 49th | Latvia | 98.82 | 2.3% |
| 50th | Bahamas, The | 99.27 | -0.1% |
| 51st | Guyana | 99.27 | 1.5% |
| 52nd | Portugal | 99.28 | -3.9% |
| 53rd | Saudi Arabia | 99.28 | 18.0% |
| 54th | Equatorial Guinea | 99.39 | -2.8% |
| 55th | Malaysia | 99.52 | -14.8% |
| 56th | Norway | 99.60 | -22.1% |
| 57th | Zambia | 99.71 | 2.6% |
| 58th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 99.76 | 3.1% |
| 59th | Iceland | 99.83 | 20.1% |
| 60th | Japan | 99.89 | -23.4% |
| 61st | North Macedonia | 100.00 | -0.6% |
| 62nd | Bulgaria | 100.02 | 4.4% |
| 63rd | Slovak Republic | 100.11 | 1.2% |
| 64th | St. Lucia | 100.19 | 2.9% |
| 65th | Slovenia | 100.28 | -1.1% |
| 66th | Peru | 100.60 | 8.0% |
| 67th | Antigua and Barbuda | 100.74 | 4.2% |
| 68th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 101.04 | 0.7% |
| 69th | Canada | 101.07 | -19.6% |
| 70th | Ukraine | 101.56 | 2.2% |
| 71st | Burundi | 102.64 | 1.8% |
| 72nd | Chile | 102.89 | -13.7% |
| 73rd | Samoa | 103.27 | 0.8% |
| 74th | United Kingdom | 103.40 | 2.5% |
| 75th | Pakistan | 103.80 | 1.3% |
| 76th | Algeria | 103.91 | -4.0% |
| 77th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 104.37 | 34.2% |
| 78th | Philippines | 104.76 | 18.8% |
| 79th | Uruguay | 104.81 | 2.7% |
| 80th | Uganda | 104.96 | 11.5% |
| 81st | Sweden | 105.12 | -12.4% |
| 82nd | Korea | 105.13 | 11.8% |
| 83rd | Colombia | 105.29 | -22.7% |
| 84th | Switzerland | 105.34 | 4.3% |
| 85th | Russian Federation | 105.69 | -21.4% |
| 86th | Fiji | 105.86 | 2.0% |
| 87th | Costa Rica | 106.19 | 4.3% |
| 88th | Indonesia | 106.39 | -3.7% |
| 89th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 106.66 | 4.3% |
| 90th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 107.20 | 1.6% |
| 91st | Trinidad and Tobago | 107.32 | 8.7% |
| 92nd | New Zealand | 107.70 | 3.6% |
| 93rd | China | 108.67 | 32.1% |
| 94th | Australia | 109.02 | -14.2% |
| 95th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 109.42 | -1.8% |
| 96th | Singapore | 110.04 | 9.8% |
| 97th | Moldova | 110.05 | 4.8% |
| 98th | Paraguay | 110.27 | -1.7% |
| 99th | Georgia | 110.40 | 1.8% |
| 100th | Nigeria | 110.50 | 9.9% |
| 101st | Solomon Islands | 111.13 | 8.5% |
| 102nd | Sierra Leone | 118.11 | 15.8% |
| 103rd | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 126.78 | 11.1% |
| 104th | Papua New Guinea | 128.24 | 17.6% |
| 105th | Türkiye | 164.80 | 3.7% |
| 106th | Argentina | 177.64 | 3.3% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2012?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2012 was 104.37. This ranked 77th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2012?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 34.2% in 2012 compared to 2011.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2012?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2012 at 177.64.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2012?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2012 was 104.37. This ranked 77th globally.
How does 2012 compare to 2011 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 97.97 in 2011 to 104.37 in 2012, a 34.2% increase.
Related
2011
2013
All years
Full ranking 2012
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking