Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2013
109.45
+28.85 from 2012
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 109.45 in 2013, increased +28.85 from 104.37 in 2012. This was the 90th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2013▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Malawi | 65.35 | -16.8% |
| 2nd | Japan | 79.64 | -38.1% |
| 3rd | Gambia, The | 81.46 | -8.5% |
| 4th | South Africa | 82.11 | -37.4% |
| 5th | Lesotho | 86.34 | -9.5% |
| 6th | Brazil | 86.41 | -45.2% |
| 7th | India | 88.26 | -4.7% |
| 8th | Ghana | 88.49 | 0.3% |
| 9th | United Arab Emirates | 89.10 | 0.3% |
| 10th | Tunisia | 93.55 | -2.9% |
| 11th | Dominican Republic | 93.58 | -2.9% |
| 12th | Lithuania | 93.91 | 0.6% |
| 13th | Dominica | 94.43 | -1.2% |
| 14th | Serbia | 94.89 | 7.0% |
| 15th | Belize | 95.49 | -1.5% |
| 16th | Estonia | 95.75 | 2.8% |
| 17th | Gabon | 95.82 | 1.1% |
| 18th | Thailand | 95.94 | 5.5% |
| 19th | Hungary | 96.01 | -15.4% |
| 20th | Poland | 96.27 | -6.9% |
| 21st | Czechia | 96.44 | -2.1% |
| 22nd | Grenada | 96.49 | -1.3% |
| 23rd | Greece | 96.50 | -12.9% |
| 24th | Croatia | 96.81 | -5.6% |
| 25th | Armenia | 96.85 | 1.9% |
| 26th | Morocco | 97.01 | 2.6% |
| 27th | Malta | 97.13 | -2.2% |
| 28th | Nicaragua | 97.24 | -0.2% |
| 29th | France | 97.33 | -4.2% |
| 30th | Cyprus | 97.38 | -9.7% |
| 31st | Ireland | 97.43 | -10.0% |
| 32nd | Canada | 97.50 | -21.9% |
| 33rd | United States | 97.56 | 19.0% |
| 34th | Germany | 97.61 | -1.0% |
| 35th | Bahrain | 97.62 | 2.0% |
| 36th | Denmark | 97.70 | -1.6% |
| 37th | Norway | 98.12 | -22.7% |
| 38th | Ukraine | 98.14 | -3.4% |
| 39th | Togo | 98.20 | 1.9% |
| 40th | Latvia | 98.54 | 2.5% |
| 41st | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 98.56 | -1.2% |
| 42nd | Bahamas, The | 98.70 | -0.6% |
| 43rd | Cameroon | 98.95 | 2.6% |
| 44th | Malaysia | 99.01 | -15.1% |
| 45th | Finland | 99.02 | 0.1% |
| 46th | Guyana | 99.19 | -0.1% |
| 47th | Portugal | 99.33 | -3.0% |
| 48th | Italy | 99.51 | -3.4% |
| 49th | Peru | 99.67 | -0.9% |
| 50th | Spain | 99.76 | -2.1% |
| 51st | Netherlands | 99.81 | 4.1% |
| 52nd | Antigua and Barbuda | 99.97 | -0.8% |
| 53rd | Belgium | 100.20 | 2.7% |
| 54th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 100.41 | -0.6% |
| 55th | Côte d'Ivoire | 100.46 | 3.2% |
| 56th | Austria | 100.50 | 5.3% |
| 57th | St. Lucia | 100.56 | 0.4% |
| 58th | Luxembourg | 100.57 | 1.1% |
| 59th | Burundi | 100.63 | -2.0% |
| 60th | Pakistan | 100.88 | -2.8% |
| 61st | Bulgaria | 100.89 | 6.2% |
| 62nd | Romania | 101.14 | 3.1% |
| 63rd | Slovenia | 101.29 | 1.0% |
| 64th | Colombia | 101.34 | -29.8% |
| 65th | Chile | 101.35 | -16.7% |
| 66th | Slovak Republic | 101.40 | 3.0% |
| 67th | Saudi Arabia | 101.56 | 17.1% |
| 68th | Algeria | 101.80 | -10.4% |
| 69th | United Kingdom | 102.08 | -2.7% |
| 70th | North Macedonia | 102.21 | 3.0% |
| 71st | Mexico | 102.24 | -17.8% |
| 72nd | Israel | 102.36 | 20.1% |
| 73rd | Equatorial Guinea | 102.65 | 3.3% |
| 74th | Samoa | 102.78 | -0.5% |
| 75th | Indonesia | 102.88 | -3.3% |
| 76th | Zambia | 103.03 | 3.3% |
| 77th | Australia | 103.48 | -19.8% |
| 78th | Switzerland | 103.62 | 6.8% |
| 79th | Iceland | 104.01 | 24.8% |
| 80th | Central African Republic | 105.19 | 7.9% |
| 81st | Fiji | 105.66 | -0.2% |
| 82nd | Uganda | 106.01 | 1.0% |
| 83rd | Sweden | 106.44 | -10.8% |
| 84th | Moldova | 106.71 | -3.0% |
| 85th | Georgia | 107.23 | -2.9% |
| 86th | Russian Federation | 107.24 | -21.2% |
| 87th | Philippines | 107.60 | 16.1% |
| 88th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 108.05 | 0.8% |
| 89th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 108.20 | -1.1% |
| 90th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 109.45 | 35.8% |
| 91st | New Zealand | 110.02 | 3.2% |
| 92nd | Costa Rica | 110.57 | 4.1% |
| 93rd | Uruguay | 111.09 | 6.0% |
| 94th | Trinidad and Tobago | 111.21 | 3.6% |
| 95th | Singapore | 112.07 | 6.7% |
| 96th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 112.27 | 5.3% |
| 97th | China | 114.65 | 31.5% |
| 98th | Paraguay | 115.34 | 4.6% |
| 99th | Nigeria | 117.55 | 6.4% |
| 100th | Solomon Islands | 118.46 | 6.6% |
| 101st | Korea | 119.03 | 27.1% |
| 102nd | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 123.52 | -2.6% |
| 103rd | Sierra Leone | 126.85 | 7.4% |
| 104th | Papua New Guinea | 126.98 | -1.0% |
| 105th | Türkiye | 162.59 | -1.3% |
| 106th | Argentina | 163.09 | -8.2% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2013?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2013 was 109.45. This ranked 90th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2013?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 35.8% in 2013 compared to 2012.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2013?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2013 at 163.09.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2013?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2013 was 109.45. This ranked 90th globally.
How does 2013 compare to 2012 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 104.37 in 2012 to 109.45 in 2013, a 35.8% increase.
Related
2012
2014
All years
Full ranking 2013
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking