Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2016
122.36
+27.31 from 2015
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 122.36 in 2016, increased +27.31 from 121.14 in 2015. This was the 97th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2016▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Malawi | 69.62 | -13.4% |
| 2nd | South Africa | 70.69 | -34.0% |
| 3rd | Ukraine | 72.15 | 0.5% |
| 4th | Brazil | 73.24 | -41.1% |
| 5th | Lesotho | 73.90 | -5.7% |
| 6th | Colombia | 74.19 | -33.4% |
| 7th | Ghana | 78.27 | 14.8% |
| 8th | Japan | 78.92 | -12.4% |
| 9th | Mexico | 79.01 | -32.6% |
| 10th | Russian Federation | 79.74 | -20.4% |
| 11th | Canada | 81.71 | -20.6% |
| 12th | Norway | 84.75 | -21.4% |
| 13th | Zambia | 85.66 | -1.2% |
| 14th | Malaysia | 86.56 | -18.9% |
| 15th | Cyprus | 87.45 | -12.4% |
| 16th | Gambia, The | 88.14 | 21.2% |
| 17th | Poland | 88.95 | -10.6% |
| 18th | Hungary | 88.99 | -13.8% |
| 19th | Ireland | 89.46 | -10.8% |
| 20th | Greece | 89.52 | -11.8% |
| 21st | Serbia | 89.76 | 0.1% |
| 22nd | Czechia | 90.96 | 3.0% |
| 23rd | Australia | 91.00 | -14.2% |
| 24th | Malta | 91.22 | -4.6% |
| 25th | Thailand | 91.49 | -3.1% |
| 26th | Tunisia | 92.50 | -5.1% |
| 27th | Chile | 92.64 | -13.4% |
| 28th | Croatia | 92.95 | -7.2% |
| 29th | France | 93.02 | -4.8% |
| 30th | Dominican Republic | 93.69 | -0.6% |
| 31st | Gabon | 93.74 | 1.1% |
| 32nd | Sweden | 93.94 | -11.8% |
| 33rd | Germany | 94.08 | -2.4% |
| 34th | Lithuania | 94.47 | 1.9% |
| 35th | Italy | 94.65 | -4.9% |
| 36th | Spain | 94.67 | -3.4% |
| 37th | Togo | 94.75 | 1.1% |
| 38th | Côte d'Ivoire | 94.83 | 1.1% |
| 39th | Estonia | 94.85 | 0.9% |
| 40th | Cameroon | 95.51 | 2.1% |
| 41st | Algeria | 95.59 | -9.8% |
| 42nd | Denmark | 95.82 | -2.7% |
| 43rd | Romania | 96.61 | -2.8% |
| 44th | Portugal | 96.68 | -2.8% |
| 45th | Bulgaria | 97.30 | 5.8% |
| 46th | Netherlands | 97.32 | 2.2% |
| 47th | Finland | 97.38 | -1.2% |
| 48th | Belgium | 97.41 | 3.1% |
| 49th | India | 97.52 | 1.2% |
| 50th | Peru | 97.75 | -0.7% |
| 51st | Uganda | 98.00 | -3.2% |
| 52nd | Dominica | 98.01 | 0.7% |
| 53rd | Luxembourg | 98.09 | -0.4% |
| 54th | Slovak Republic | 98.25 | 2.4% |
| 55th | North Macedonia | 98.32 | 2.1% |
| 56th | Slovenia | 98.57 | 0.4% |
| 57th | Grenada | 98.67 | 2.3% |
| 58th | Morocco | 98.98 | 3.3% |
| 59th | Georgia | 99.24 | 0.9% |
| 60th | Latvia | 99.76 | 4.8% |
| 61st | Austria | 99.88 | 4.4% |
| 62nd | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 100.34 | 2.5% |
| 63rd | Bahamas, The | 101.28 | -1.0% |
| 64th | Equatorial Guinea | 101.68 | 1.8% |
| 65th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 101.75 | -0.4% |
| 66th | Moldova | 101.81 | 2.7% |
| 67th | Indonesia | 102.25 | 4.5% |
| 68th | Nicaragua | 102.26 | 0.2% |
| 69th | United Kingdom | 102.51 | -11.3% |
| 70th | Armenia | 102.62 | -1.3% |
| 71st | Israel | 103.53 | 13.4% |
| 72nd | St. Kitts and Nevis | 103.70 | 0.3% |
| 73rd | St. Lucia | 104.15 | -2.0% |
| 74th | United Arab Emirates | 104.25 | 2.3% |
| 75th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 104.44 | 0.7% |
| 76th | Samoa | 104.66 | 1.1% |
| 77th | Belize | 105.01 | 2.1% |
| 78th | New Zealand | 106.20 | 1.8% |
| 79th | Guyana | 106.30 | 2.5% |
| 80th | Switzerland | 108.16 | 6.1% |
| 81st | Singapore | 108.29 | 3.3% |
| 82nd | Philippines | 108.40 | 7.8% |
| 83rd | Uruguay | 108.80 | 1.3% |
| 84th | Bahrain | 108.97 | 3.0% |
| 85th | Fiji | 110.16 | 4.3% |
| 86th | Nigeria | 110.86 | -7.5% |
| 87th | Paraguay | 110.98 | -3.3% |
| 88th | Antigua and Barbuda | 111.70 | 1.2% |
| 89th | Costa Rica | 113.97 | -0.7% |
| 90th | United States | 114.57 | 22.8% |
| 91st | Saudi Arabia | 117.27 | 19.7% |
| 92nd | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 118.30 | -2.7% |
| 93rd | Central African Republic | 118.76 | 5.4% |
| 94th | Burundi | 118.90 | 1.2% |
| 95th | Pakistan | 119.67 | 3.2% |
| 96th | Papua New Guinea | 121.35 | -5.1% |
| 97th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 122.36 | 28.7% |
| 98th | China | 123.89 | 19.3% |
| 99th | Argentina | 128.54 | -17.4% |
| 100th | Iceland | 128.56 | 35.9% |
| 101st | Solomon Islands | 128.63 | 0.7% |
| 102nd | Trinidad and Tobago | 129.37 | -1.3% |
| 103rd | Sierra Leone | 130.05 | -8.8% |
| 104th | Korea | 139.06 | 34.0% |
| 105th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 143.46 | 4.2% |
| 106th | Türkiye | 147.29 | -1.8% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2016?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2016 was 122.36. This ranked 97th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2016?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 28.7% in 2016 compared to 2015.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2016?▾
Türkiye had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2016 at 147.29.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2016?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2016 was 122.36. This ranked 97th globally.
How does 2016 compare to 2015 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 121.14 in 2015 to 122.36 in 2016, a 28.7% increase.
Related
2015
2017
All years
Full ranking 2016
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking