Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2015
121.14
+34.20 from 2014
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 121.14 in 2015, increased +34.20 from 112.44 in 2014. This was the 96th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2015▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Ghana | 68.20 | -1.8% |
| 2nd | Japan | 69.42 | -28.2% |
| 3rd | Brazil | 69.61 | -53.2% |
| 4th | Ukraine | 71.77 | -6.8% |
| 5th | Gambia, The | 72.74 | -1.2% |
| 6th | South Africa | 75.23 | -31.4% |
| 7th | Colombia | 77.58 | -42.0% |
| 8th | Lesotho | 78.33 | -3.9% |
| 9th | Russian Federation | 79.95 | -35.9% |
| 10th | Malawi | 80.40 | 13.8% |
| 11th | Canada | 83.27 | -26.5% |
| 12th | Norway | 84.25 | -29.1% |
| 13th | Zambia | 86.74 | -11.9% |
| 14th | Cyprus | 88.19 | -16.6% |
| 15th | Hungary | 88.32 | -18.1% |
| 16th | Ireland | 88.36 | -18.8% |
| 17th | Czechia | 88.61 | -2.8% |
| 18th | Greece | 89.31 | -16.9% |
| 19th | Malta | 89.55 | -11.2% |
| 20th | Malaysia | 89.57 | -23.0% |
| 21st | Serbia | 89.71 | -4.4% |
| 22nd | Australia | 89.82 | -23.0% |
| 23rd | Mexico | 90.63 | -30.6% |
| 24th | Chile | 90.99 | -16.6% |
| 25th | France | 92.04 | -10.4% |
| 26th | Germany | 92.50 | -9.0% |
| 27th | Poland | 92.57 | -11.7% |
| 28th | Croatia | 92.63 | -9.4% |
| 29th | Gabon | 92.68 | -6.6% |
| 30th | Lithuania | 92.68 | -2.0% |
| 31st | Sweden | 93.24 | -18.6% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 93.54 | -6.2% |
| 33rd | Togo | 93.73 | -5.7% |
| 34th | Côte d'Ivoire | 93.76 | -6.9% |
| 35th | Italy | 93.83 | -10.2% |
| 36th | Spain | 93.87 | -8.8% |
| 37th | Estonia | 94.04 | -2.5% |
| 38th | Dominican Republic | 94.26 | 2.8% |
| 39th | Denmark | 94.43 | -6.4% |
| 40th | Thailand | 94.45 | 1.4% |
| 41st | Belgium | 94.51 | -4.3% |
| 42nd | Portugal | 95.16 | -6.2% |
| 43rd | Netherlands | 95.97 | -3.6% |
| 44th | Finland | 96.10 | -6.1% |
| 45th | India | 96.36 | 7.5% |
| 46th | Grenada | 96.41 | 3.0% |
| 47th | Algeria | 96.57 | -14.0% |
| 48th | Morocco | 96.84 | 0.6% |
| 49th | Bulgaria | 97.08 | 3.0% |
| 50th | Luxembourg | 97.12 | -3.8% |
| 51st | Dominica | 97.33 | 3.4% |
| 52nd | Tunisia | 97.49 | 4.3% |
| 53rd | Slovak Republic | 97.60 | -1.9% |
| 54th | Indonesia | 97.85 | 1.6% |
| 55th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 97.89 | 6.6% |
| 56th | North Macedonia | 98.14 | -2.6% |
| 57th | Slovenia | 98.15 | -3.1% |
| 58th | Latvia | 98.19 | 2.5% |
| 59th | Romania | 98.33 | -4.9% |
| 60th | Austria | 98.33 | -0.1% |
| 61st | Georgia | 98.40 | -7.5% |
| 62nd | Peru | 98.40 | 0.0% |
| 63rd | Moldova | 99.12 | -3.5% |
| 64th | Equatorial Guinea | 99.88 | -6.4% |
| 65th | Uganda | 101.21 | -6.0% |
| 66th | Israel | 101.83 | 11.0% |
| 67th | United Arab Emirates | 101.88 | 12.2% |
| 68th | Nicaragua | 102.08 | 4.9% |
| 69th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 102.20 | -4.5% |
| 70th | Bahamas, The | 102.26 | 3.3% |
| 71st | Belize | 102.86 | 6.6% |
| 72nd | St. Kitts and Nevis | 103.38 | 3.5% |
| 73rd | Samoa | 103.49 | 2.0% |
| 74th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 103.70 | 5.9% |
| 75th | Guyana | 103.70 | 5.3% |
| 76th | Armenia | 104.00 | 3.0% |
| 77th | New Zealand | 105.13 | -7.1% |
| 78th | Fiji | 105.63 | 1.7% |
| 79th | Bahrain | 105.75 | 6.9% |
| 80th | St. Lucia | 106.32 | 3.4% |
| 81st | Uruguay | 107.38 | 0.5% |
| 82nd | Singapore | 108.34 | 1.3% |
| 83rd | United States | 109.91 | 30.6% |
| 84th | Antigua and Barbuda | 110.35 | 10.0% |
| 85th | Switzerland | 110.48 | 14.6% |
| 86th | Philippines | 111.49 | 16.9% |
| 87th | Central African Republic | 112.64 | -6.0% |
| 88th | Saudi Arabia | 113.58 | 26.2% |
| 89th | Iceland | 113.75 | 23.7% |
| 90th | United Kingdom | 113.76 | 2.8% |
| 91st | Costa Rica | 114.75 | 7.8% |
| 92nd | Paraguay | 114.78 | -2.4% |
| 93rd | Pakistan | 116.01 | 7.6% |
| 94th | Burundi | 117.52 | 12.6% |
| 95th | Nigeria | 119.86 | -4.0% |
| 96th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 121.14 | 39.3% |
| 97th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 121.61 | 11.1% |
| 98th | Solomon Islands | 127.70 | 2.5% |
| 99th | Papua New Guinea | 127.91 | 4.2% |
| 100th | China | 130.04 | 36.9% |
| 101st | Trinidad and Tobago | 131.08 | 11.8% |
| 102nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 137.63 | 14.6% |
| 103rd | Korea | 142.05 | 37.3% |
| 104th | Sierra Leone | 142.62 | 8.2% |
| 105th | Türkiye | 150.03 | -2.2% |
| 106th | Argentina | 155.58 | 15.8% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2015?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2015 was 121.14. This ranked 96th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2015?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 39.3% in 2015 compared to 2014.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2015?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2015 at 155.58.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2015?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2015 was 121.14. This ranked 96th globally.
How does 2015 compare to 2014 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 112.44 in 2014 to 121.14 in 2015, a 39.3% increase.
Related
2014
2016
All years
Full ranking 2015
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking