Suriname - Consumer Price Index 1992
Suriname's consumer price index was 0.19 in 1992, increased +0.06 from 0.13 in 1991. This was the 10th highest globally.
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Angola | 0.00 | 299.5% |
| 2nd | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 0.00 | 4,129.2% |
| 3rd | Belarus | 0.00 | - |
| 4th | Ukraine | 0.00 | - |
| 5th | Azerbaijan | 0.04 | -10.6% |
| 6th | Brazil | 0.05 | 952.0% |
| 7th | Russian Federation | 0.05 | - |
| 8th | Moldova | 0.11 | 1,026.8% |
| 9th | Iraq | 0.16 | 83.6% |
| 10th | Suriname | 0.19 | 43.7% |
| 11th | Türkiye | 0.20 | 70.1% |
| 12th | Romania | 0.24 | 211.2% |
| 13th | Bulgaria | 0.30 | 91.3% |
| 14th | Sudan | 0.92 | 117.6% |
| 15th | Zambia | 1.14 | 165.7% |
| 16th | Croatia | 1.75 | 625.0% |
| 17th | Mongolia | 2.29 | - |
| 18th | Ghana | 2.44 | 10.1% |
| 19th | Myanmar | 2.71 | 21.9% |
| 20th | Malawi | 2.92 | 23.8% |
| 21st | Ecuador | 3.05 | 54.6% |
| 22nd | Nigeria | 3.94 | 44.6% |
| 23rd | Lithuania | 4.18 | 1,020.6% |
| 24th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 4.38 | 25.8% |
| 25th | Lao PDR | 4.57 | 9.9% |
| 26th | Yemen, Republic of | 6.77 | 29.4% |
| 27th | Uruguay | 7.26 | 68.5% |
| 28th | Haiti | 8.12 | 19.4% |
| 29th | Jamaica | 9.98 | 77.3% |
| 30th | Madagascar | 10.14 | 14.5% |
| 31st | Burundi | 11.64 | 1.8% |
| 32nd | Estonia | 11.64 | - |
| 33rd | Latvia | 11.88 | 951.7% |
| 34th | Guinea-Bissau | 12.24 | 69.6% |
| 35th | Honduras | 13.14 | 8.8% |
| 36th | Kenya | 13.26 | 27.3% |
| 37th | Tanzania | 13.34 | 21.8% |
| 38th | Costa Rica | 13.41 | 21.8% |
| 39th | Indonesia | 14.89 | 7.5% |
| 40th | Hungary | 15.39 | 23.7% |
| 41st | Colombia | 15.57 | 27.0% |
| 42nd | Rwanda | 16.13 | 9.6% |
| 43rd | Mexico | 16.65 | 15.5% |
| 44th | Albania | 16.67 | 226.0% |
| 45th | Poland | 18.04 | 46.1% |
| 46th | Dominican Republic | 18.10 | 4.3% |
| 47th | Sri Lanka | 18.10 | 11.4% |
| 48th | Paraguay | 19.19 | 15.2% |
| 49th | Solomon Islands | 20.79 | 10.8% |
| 50th | Botswana | 21.11 | 16.2% |
| 51st | Pakistan | 22.03 | 9.5% |
| 52nd | Papua New Guinea | 23.86 | 4.3% |
| 53rd | Eswatini | 23.97 | 7.6% |
| 54th | Slovenia | 24.77 | 209.9% |
| 55th | Algeria | 25.72 | 31.7% |
| 56th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 26.06 | 13.6% |
| 57th | Guatemala | 26.76 | 10.0% |
| 58th | Equatorial Guinea | 27.48 | -4.3% |
| 59th | Peru | 27.79 | 73.5% |
| 60th | Slovak Republic | 28.70 | 9.9% |
| 61st | India | 29.21 | 11.8% |
| 62nd | Nepal | 31.96 | 17.1% |
| 63rd | Trinidad and Tobago | 33.20 | 6.4% |
| 64th | Mauritius | 33.40 | 4.6% |
| 65th | South Africa | 33.45 | 13.9% |
| 66th | Bhutan | 33.88 | 16.0% |
| 67th | Mauritania | 34.45 | 10.1% |
| 68th | Bangladesh | 35.55 | 3.6% |
| 69th | Congo, Republic of | 35.76 | -3.9% |
| 70th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 35.84 | 12.1% |
| 71st | Philippines | 37.04 | 8.7% |
| 72nd | Tonga | 38.21 | 7.9% |
| 73rd | Czechia | 38.76 | 11.1% |
| 74th | Benin | 38.90 | - |
| 75th | Seychelles | 39.66 | 3.2% |
| 76th | Togo | 39.87 | 1.4% |
| 77th | Gambia, The | 40.00 | 9.5% |
| 78th | Syrian Arab Republic | 40.40 | 11.0% |
| 79th | El Salvador | 40.93 | 11.2% |
| 80th | Greece | 41.26 | 15.9% |
| 81st | Chile | 42.16 | 15.4% |
| 82nd | Israel | 43.39 | 12.1% |
| 83rd | Chad | 43.51 | -3.1% |
| 84th | Iceland | 44.36 | 3.9% |
| 85th | Côte d'Ivoire | 44.38 | 4.2% |
| 86th | Samoa | 44.51 | 9.0% |
| 87th | China | 44.54 | 6.4% |
| 88th | Niger | 46.08 | -4.5% |
| 89th | Cameroon | 46.97 | 0.0% |
| 90th | Maldives | 47.33 | 16.9% |
| 91st | Central African Republic | 47.83 | -1.0% |
| 92nd | Burkina Faso | 49.23 | -2.0% |
| 93rd | Qatar | 50.07 | 3.1% |
| 94th | Mali | 50.46 | -6.2% |
| 95th | Korea | 51.74 | 6.2% |
| 96th | Gabon | 51.95 | -9.5% |
| 97th | Senegal | 53.08 | -0.1% |
| 98th | Jordan | 53.61 | 4.0% |
| 99th | Aruba | 54.05 | 3.9% |
| 100th | Cabo Verde | 54.28 | 3.1% |
| 101st | Tunisia | 54.55 | 5.8% |
| 102nd | Thailand | 54.78 | 4.1% |
| 103rd | Fiji | 55.77 | 4.9% |
| 104th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 55.86 | 2.9% |
| 105th | Barbados | 57.63 | 6.1% |
| 106th | Spain | 58.21 | 5.9% |
| 107th | Portugal | 58.78 | 9.6% |
| 108th | Cyprus | 59.60 | 6.5% |
| 109th | Kuwait | 60.45 | -0.5% |
| 110th | Malta | 61.80 | 1.6% |
| 111th | Vanuatu | 61.90 | 4.1% |
| 112th | Malaysia | 62.12 | 4.8% |
| 113th | Australia | 62.30 | 1.0% |
| 114th | Italy | 62.46 | 5.3% |
| 115th | Grenada | 62.87 | 3.8% |
| 116th | Macao SAR, China | 63.21 | 7.7% |
| 117th | St. Lucia | 63.72 | 5.1% |
| 118th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 63.79 | 3.5% |
| 119th | United States | 64.35 | 3.0% |
| 120th | Ireland | 64.84 | 3.1% |
| 121st | Morocco | 64.98 | 5.7% |
| 122nd | New Zealand | 67.03 | 1.0% |
| 123rd | Belize | 68.66 | 2.4% |
| 124th | United Kingdom | 68.67 | 4.6% |
| 125th | Netherlands | 68.69 | 3.2% |
| 126th | Luxembourg | 68.79 | 3.2% |
| 127th | Norway | 68.81 | 2.3% |
| 128th | Denmark | 69.11 | 2.1% |
| 129th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 69.48 | 9.7% |
| 130th | Belgium | 70.24 | 2.4% |
| 131st | Austria | 70.64 | 4.0% |
| 132nd | Bahamas, The | 70.82 | 5.7% |
| 133rd | Libya | 70.87 | 9.4% |
| 134th | Panama | 70.99 | 1.8% |
| 135th | Lesotho | 71.43 | 17.2% |
| 136th | Canada | 72.12 | 1.5% |
| 137th | Dominica | 72.77 | 5.5% |
| 138th | Saudi Arabia | 73.10 | -0.1% |
| 139th | Germany | 73.76 | 5.1% |
| 140th | France | 75.21 | 2.4% |
| 141st | Singapore | 75.95 | 2.3% |
| 142nd | Finland | 76.82 | 2.9% |
| 143rd | Sweden | 76.89 | 2.4% |
| 144th | Bahrain | 78.92 | -0.2% |
| 145th | Brunei Darussalam | 80.31 | 1.3% |
| 146th | Switzerland | 83.38 | 4.0% |
| 147th | Japan | 99.33 | 1.8% |
FAQ
Suriname's consumer price index in 1992 was 0.19. This ranked 10th globally.
Suriname's consumer price index increased by 43.7% in 1992 compared to 1991.
Japan had the highest consumer price index in 1992 at 99.33.
The consumer price index of Suriname in 1992 was 0.19. This ranked 10th globally.
Suriname's consumer price index went from 0.13 in 1991 to 0.19 in 1992, a 43.7% increase.
Suriname matched the Fiscal Dominance Trap pattern in 1992. Historically: 386 occurrences, 278 successful (72%). Outcome 24 months later: 368.5%. View full analysis →