Zambia - Energy Use per Capita 2002
604
+7 from 2001
Zambia's energy use per capita was 604 in 2002, increased +7 from 596 in 2001. This was the 46th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2002▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 127 | 0.1% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 140 | 1.1% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 148 | -0.2% |
| 4th | Madagascar | 236 | -7.2% |
| 5th | Congo, Republic of | 239 | -1.7% |
| 6th | Chad | 240 | -0.9% |
| 7th | Yemen, Republic of | 245 | -6.0% |
| 8th | Senegal | 250 | -1.5% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 272 | -1.5% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 277 | 0.4% |
| 11th | Myanmar | 281 | 2.3% |
| 12th | Nigeria | 284 | 0.3% |
| 13th | Benin | 295 | 4.1% |
| 14th | Eritrea | 300 | -7.1% |
| 15th | Ghana | 304 | -3.0% |
| 16th | Lao PDR | 309 | 1.2% |
| 17th | Tajikistan | 326 | -1.6% |
| 18th | Nepal | 334 | -0.4% |
| 19th | Haiti | 361 | 1.8% |
| 20th | Côte d'Ivoire | 374 | 4.2% |
| 21st | Uganda | 387 | 0.3% |
| 22nd | India | 397 | 1.0% |
| 23rd | Togo | 403 | 1.0% |
| 24th | Pakistan | 404 | -0.9% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 406 | 2.2% |
| 26th | Morocco | 407 | 0.3% |
| 27th | Rwanda | 408 | 0.4% |
| 28th | Mozambique | 409 | 0.6% |
| 29th | Sri Lanka | 414 | 0.8% |
| 30th | Viet Nam | 425 | 8.0% |
| 31st | Angola | 429 | 0.2% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 430 | 2.3% |
| 33rd | Kenya | 445 | -1.6% |
| 34th | Equatorial Guinea | 451 | 30.3% |
| 35th | Philippines | 451 | -0.6% |
| 36th | Peru | 478 | -1.0% |
| 37th | Kyrgyz Republic | 485 | 11.3% |
| 38th | Honduras | 489 | 2.0% |
| 39th | Nicaragua | 493 | -1.2% |
| 40th | Sudan | 518 | 4.7% |
| 41st | Zimbabwe | 520 | -3.8% |
| 42nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 520 | 17.0% |
| 43rd | El Salvador | 582 | 2.5% |
| 44th | Armenia | 586 | -6.1% |
| 45th | Namibia | 602 | -9.4% |
| 46th | Zambia | 604 | 1.3% |
| 47th | Indonesia | 606 | 2.6% |
| 48th | Colombia | 634 | -3.5% |
| 49th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 637 | 0.4% |
| 50th | Georgia | 639 | -0.1% |
| 51st | Albania | 661 | 10.5% |
| 52nd | Guatemala | 692 | 12.0% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 709 | 6.1% |
| 54th | Paraguay | 740 | -2.2% |
| 55th | Costa Rica | 749 | 3.9% |
| 56th | Uruguay | 772 | -7.2% |
| 57th | Tunisia | 784 | 0.3% |
| 58th | Panama | 791 | -10.8% |
| 59th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 817 | -4.5% |
| 60th | Mauritius | 873 | -1.5% |
| 61st | Dominican Republic | 882 | 7.6% |
| 62nd | Eswatini | 895 | -0.2% |
| 63rd | Jordan | 901 | 2.8% |
| 64th | Algeria | 911 | 5.6% |
| 65th | Syrian Arab Republic | 942 | 1.4% |
| 66th | Suriname | 963 | -28.7% |
| 67th | China | 976 | 5.9% |
| 68th | Mongolia | 1,026 | 5.6% |
| 69th | Kosovo | 1,035 | -0.9% |
| 70th | Cuba | 1,038 | -7.1% |
| 71st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,052 | 4.7% |
| 72nd | Botswana | 1,058 | -0.3% |
| 73rd | Moldova | 1,063 | 1.7% |
| 74th | Iraq | 1,093 | -7.7% |
| 75th | Brazil | 1,103 | 1.5% |
| 76th | Türkiye | 1,107 | 4.4% |
| 77th | Lebanon | 1,175 | -2.0% |
| 78th | North Macedonia | 1,251 | -1.2% |
| 79th | Thailand | 1,286 | 9.5% |
| 80th | Jamaica | 1,291 | -4.9% |
| 81st | Azerbaijan | 1,415 | 0.3% |
| 82nd | Gabon | 1,417 | 17.5% |
| 83rd | Argentina | 1,484 | -2.3% |
| 84th | Mexico | 1,557 | -0.4% |
| 85th | Chile | 1,612 | 2.4% |
| 86th | Romania | 1,755 | 5.3% |
| 87th | Latvia | 1,763 | 0.2% |
| 88th | Malta | 1,852 | -7.5% |
| 89th | Uzbekistan | 1,908 | 2.4% |
| 90th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1,934 | -6.9% |
| 91st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,030 | 2.6% |
| 92nd | South Africa | 2,072 | -5.0% |
| 93rd | Croatia | 2,082 | 2.4% |
| 94th | Serbia | 2,098 | 6.8% |
| 95th | Malaysia | 2,154 | 0.9% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,194 | -0.4% |
| 97th | Turkmenistan | 2,215 | -18.0% |
| 98th | Poland | 2,313 | -1.1% |
| 99th | Bulgaria | 2,410 | -0.4% |
| 100th | Portugal | 2,478 | 3.6% |
| 101st | Hungary | 2,520 | 0.3% |
| 102nd | Kazakhstan | 2,538 | 14.5% |
| 103rd | Belarus | 2,561 | 2.6% |
| 104th | Lithuania | 2,579 | 8.0% |
| 105th | Greece | 2,604 | 0.8% |
| 106th | Ukraine | 2,786 | 2.0% |
| 107th | Israel | 2,863 | -3.7% |
| 108th | Italy | 3,036 | 0.5% |
| 109th | Libya | 3,090 | 0.5% |
| 110th | Spain | 3,096 | 1.5% |
| 111th | Estonia | 3,376 | -6.0% |
| 112th | Oman | 3,469 | 5.0% |
| 113th | Slovak Republic | 3,484 | 0.8% |
| 114th | Slovenia | 3,485 | 0.0% |
| 115th | European Union | 3,510 | -0.1% |
| 116th | Denmark | 3,536 | -1.4% |
| 117th | Switzerland | 3,538 | -3.3% |
| 118th | Ireland | 3,663 | -1.4% |
| 119th | United Kingdom | 3,717 | -1.8% |
| 120th | Austria | 3,772 | 0.3% |
| 121st | Japan | 3,993 | 0.1% |
| 122nd | Korea | 4,093 | 4.3% |
| 123rd | Germany | 4,109 | -2.4% |
| 124th | Czechia | 4,201 | 1.5% |
| 125th | France | 4,220 | -0.5% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,289 | 0.0% |
| 127th | New Zealand | 4,326 | -1.7% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,773 | 1.6% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,805 | 0.4% |
| 130th | Singapore | 5,066 | -1.6% |
| 131st | Belgium | 5,398 | -3.7% |
| 132nd | Australia | 5,480 | -0.1% |
| 133rd | Norway | 5,502 | -7.6% |
| 134th | Sweden | 5,826 | 2.2% |
| 135th | Brunei Darussalam | 6,345 | -4.2% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,723 | 4.9% |
| 137th | Saudi Arabia | 6,827 | 7.5% |
| 138th | United States | 7,840 | 0.2% |
| 139th | Canada | 7,943 | -0.9% |
| 140th | Luxembourg | 8,205 | 2.7% |
| 141st | Trinidad and Tobago | 8,991 | 7.8% |
| 142nd | Kuwait | 9,711 | -1.5% |
| 143rd | United Arab Emirates | 10,866 | -7.2% |
| 144th | Iceland | 11,168 | 2.2% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 12,215 | -3.4% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 16,514 | -1.8% |
| 147th | Qatar | 19,201 | 7.8% |
FAQ
What was Zambia's energy use per capita in 2002?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita in 2002 was 604. This ranked 46th globally.
How did Zambia's energy use per capita change in 2002?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita increased by 1.3% in 2002 compared to 2001.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2002?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2002 at 19,201.
What is the energy use per capita of Zambia in 2002?▾
The energy use per capita of Zambia in 2002 was 604. This ranked 46th globally.
How does 2002 compare to 2001 for Zambia's energy use per capita?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita went from 596 in 2001 to 604 in 2002, a 1.3% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Zambia matched the Orthodox Tightening Cycle pattern in 2002. Historically: 311 occurrences, 177 successful (57%). Outcome 24 months later: 18.0%. View full analysis →
Related
2001
2003
All years
Full ranking 2002
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2025
Lowest: 2000
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Uganda
vs Tanzania
vs Guinea-Bissau
vs Nigeria
African Union Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking