Hong Kong SAR, China - Energy Use per Capita 2002
1,934
−144 from 2001
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita was 1,934 in 2002, decreased +144 from 2,079 in 2001. This was the 90th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2002▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 127 | 0.1% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 140 | 1.1% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 148 | -0.2% |
| 4th | Madagascar | 236 | -7.2% |
| 5th | Congo, Republic of | 239 | -1.7% |
| 6th | Chad | 240 | -0.9% |
| 7th | Yemen, Republic of | 245 | -6.0% |
| 8th | Senegal | 250 | -1.5% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 272 | -1.5% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 277 | 0.4% |
| 11th | Myanmar | 281 | 2.3% |
| 12th | Nigeria | 284 | 0.3% |
| 13th | Benin | 295 | 4.1% |
| 14th | Eritrea | 300 | -7.1% |
| 15th | Ghana | 304 | -3.0% |
| 16th | Lao PDR | 309 | 1.2% |
| 17th | Tajikistan | 326 | -1.6% |
| 18th | Nepal | 334 | -0.4% |
| 19th | Haiti | 361 | 1.8% |
| 20th | Côte d'Ivoire | 374 | 4.2% |
| 21st | Uganda | 387 | 0.3% |
| 22nd | India | 397 | 1.0% |
| 23rd | Togo | 403 | 1.0% |
| 24th | Pakistan | 404 | -0.9% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 406 | 2.2% |
| 26th | Morocco | 407 | 0.3% |
| 27th | Rwanda | 408 | 0.4% |
| 28th | Mozambique | 409 | 0.6% |
| 29th | Sri Lanka | 414 | 0.8% |
| 30th | Viet Nam | 425 | 8.0% |
| 31st | Angola | 429 | 0.2% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 430 | 2.3% |
| 33rd | Kenya | 445 | -1.6% |
| 34th | Equatorial Guinea | 451 | 30.3% |
| 35th | Philippines | 451 | -0.6% |
| 36th | Peru | 478 | -1.0% |
| 37th | Kyrgyz Republic | 485 | 11.3% |
| 38th | Honduras | 489 | 2.0% |
| 39th | Nicaragua | 493 | -1.2% |
| 40th | Sudan | 518 | 4.7% |
| 41st | Zimbabwe | 520 | -3.8% |
| 42nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 520 | 17.0% |
| 43rd | El Salvador | 582 | 2.5% |
| 44th | Armenia | 586 | -6.1% |
| 45th | Namibia | 602 | -9.4% |
| 46th | Zambia | 604 | 1.3% |
| 47th | Indonesia | 606 | 2.6% |
| 48th | Colombia | 634 | -3.5% |
| 49th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 637 | 0.4% |
| 50th | Georgia | 639 | -0.1% |
| 51st | Albania | 661 | 10.5% |
| 52nd | Guatemala | 692 | 12.0% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 709 | 6.1% |
| 54th | Paraguay | 740 | -2.2% |
| 55th | Costa Rica | 749 | 3.9% |
| 56th | Uruguay | 772 | -7.2% |
| 57th | Tunisia | 784 | 0.3% |
| 58th | Panama | 791 | -10.8% |
| 59th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 817 | -4.5% |
| 60th | Mauritius | 873 | -1.5% |
| 61st | Dominican Republic | 882 | 7.6% |
| 62nd | Eswatini | 895 | -0.2% |
| 63rd | Jordan | 901 | 2.8% |
| 64th | Algeria | 911 | 5.6% |
| 65th | Syrian Arab Republic | 942 | 1.4% |
| 66th | Suriname | 963 | -28.7% |
| 67th | China | 976 | 5.9% |
| 68th | Mongolia | 1,026 | 5.6% |
| 69th | Kosovo | 1,035 | -0.9% |
| 70th | Cuba | 1,038 | -7.1% |
| 71st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,052 | 4.7% |
| 72nd | Botswana | 1,058 | -0.3% |
| 73rd | Moldova | 1,063 | 1.7% |
| 74th | Iraq | 1,093 | -7.7% |
| 75th | Brazil | 1,103 | 1.5% |
| 76th | Türkiye | 1,107 | 4.4% |
| 77th | Lebanon | 1,175 | -2.0% |
| 78th | North Macedonia | 1,251 | -1.2% |
| 79th | Thailand | 1,286 | 9.5% |
| 80th | Jamaica | 1,291 | -4.9% |
| 81st | Azerbaijan | 1,415 | 0.3% |
| 82nd | Gabon | 1,417 | 17.5% |
| 83rd | Argentina | 1,484 | -2.3% |
| 84th | Mexico | 1,557 | -0.4% |
| 85th | Chile | 1,612 | 2.4% |
| 86th | Romania | 1,755 | 5.3% |
| 87th | Latvia | 1,763 | 0.2% |
| 88th | Malta | 1,852 | -7.5% |
| 89th | Uzbekistan | 1,908 | 2.4% |
| 90th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1,934 | -6.9% |
| 91st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,030 | 2.6% |
| 92nd | South Africa | 2,072 | -5.0% |
| 93rd | Croatia | 2,082 | 2.4% |
| 94th | Serbia | 2,098 | 6.8% |
| 95th | Malaysia | 2,154 | 0.9% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,194 | -0.4% |
| 97th | Turkmenistan | 2,215 | -18.0% |
| 98th | Poland | 2,313 | -1.1% |
| 99th | Bulgaria | 2,410 | -0.4% |
| 100th | Portugal | 2,478 | 3.6% |
| 101st | Hungary | 2,520 | 0.3% |
| 102nd | Kazakhstan | 2,538 | 14.5% |
| 103rd | Belarus | 2,561 | 2.6% |
| 104th | Lithuania | 2,579 | 8.0% |
| 105th | Greece | 2,604 | 0.8% |
| 106th | Ukraine | 2,786 | 2.0% |
| 107th | Israel | 2,863 | -3.7% |
| 108th | Italy | 3,036 | 0.5% |
| 109th | Libya | 3,090 | 0.5% |
| 110th | Spain | 3,096 | 1.5% |
| 111th | Estonia | 3,376 | -6.0% |
| 112th | Oman | 3,469 | 5.0% |
| 113th | Slovak Republic | 3,484 | 0.8% |
| 114th | Slovenia | 3,485 | 0.0% |
| 115th | European Union | 3,510 | -0.1% |
| 116th | Denmark | 3,536 | -1.4% |
| 117th | Switzerland | 3,538 | -3.3% |
| 118th | Ireland | 3,663 | -1.4% |
| 119th | United Kingdom | 3,717 | -1.8% |
| 120th | Austria | 3,772 | 0.3% |
| 121st | Japan | 3,993 | 0.1% |
| 122nd | Korea | 4,093 | 4.3% |
| 123rd | Germany | 4,109 | -2.4% |
| 124th | Czechia | 4,201 | 1.5% |
| 125th | France | 4,220 | -0.5% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,289 | 0.0% |
| 127th | New Zealand | 4,326 | -1.7% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,773 | 1.6% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,805 | 0.4% |
| 130th | Singapore | 5,066 | -1.6% |
| 131st | Belgium | 5,398 | -3.7% |
| 132nd | Australia | 5,480 | -0.1% |
| 133rd | Norway | 5,502 | -7.6% |
| 134th | Sweden | 5,826 | 2.2% |
| 135th | Brunei Darussalam | 6,345 | -4.2% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,723 | 4.9% |
| 137th | Saudi Arabia | 6,827 | 7.5% |
| 138th | United States | 7,840 | 0.2% |
| 139th | Canada | 7,943 | -0.9% |
| 140th | Luxembourg | 8,205 | 2.7% |
| 141st | Trinidad and Tobago | 8,991 | 7.8% |
| 142nd | Kuwait | 9,711 | -1.5% |
| 143rd | United Arab Emirates | 10,866 | -7.2% |
| 144th | Iceland | 11,168 | 2.2% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 12,215 | -3.4% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 16,514 | -1.8% |
| 147th | Qatar | 19,201 | 7.8% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita in 2002?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita in 2002 was 1,934. This ranked 90th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita change in 2002?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita decreased by 6.9% in 2002 compared to 2001.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2002?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2002 at 19,201.
What is the energy use per capita of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2002?▾
The energy use per capita of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2002 was 1,934. This ranked 90th globally.
How does 2002 compare to 2001 for Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita went from 2,079 in 2001 to 1,934 in 2002, a 6.9% decrease.
Related
2001
2003
All years
Full ranking 2002
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 1999
Lowest: 2025
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking