Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2001
151.90
+37.42 from 2000
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 151.90 in 2001, increased +37.42 from 146.69 in 2000. This was the 102nd highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2001▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Slovak Republic | 58.65 | 2.8% |
| 2nd | Russian Federation | 63.49 | -9.5% |
| 3rd | Brazil | 63.91 | -45.5% |
| 4th | Equatorial Guinea | 64.32 | 5.1% |
| 5th | Australia | 67.57 | -18.5% |
| 6th | Zambia | 68.33 | 14.4% |
| 7th | Serbia | 69.80 | -58.3% |
| 8th | Czechia | 71.23 | 8.3% |
| 9th | Bulgaria | 72.53 | 9.6% |
| 10th | Indonesia | 72.78 | -4.9% |
| 11th | Armenia | 73.12 | -1.2% |
| 12th | Canada | 73.41 | -22.4% |
| 13th | New Zealand | 75.60 | -1.9% |
| 14th | Moldova | 75.83 | 3.7% |
| 15th | Thailand | 76.65 | -4.6% |
| 16th | Trinidad and Tobago | 76.77 | 5.7% |
| 17th | Estonia | 76.85 | 3.0% |
| 18th | Samoa | 76.93 | 3.0% |
| 19th | Nigeria | 78.18 | 11.4% |
| 20th | Hungary | 78.73 | -6.4% |
| 21st | Colombia | 78.88 | -25.5% |
| 22nd | Lithuania | 82.06 | 0.2% |
| 23rd | Papua New Guinea | 82.63 | -6.5% |
| 24th | Romania | 83.02 | 0.7% |
| 25th | Ireland | 84.87 | -8.4% |
| 26th | Georgia | 85.54 | 0.4% |
| 27th | Greece | 86.22 | -11.0% |
| 28th | Philippines | 86.44 | 8.1% |
| 29th | South Africa | 88.79 | -32.0% |
| 30th | Central African Republic | 89.20 | 2.2% |
| 31st | Côte d'Ivoire | 89.65 | 3.6% |
| 32nd | United Arab Emirates | 89.92 | 6.1% |
| 33rd | Spain | 90.11 | -1.2% |
| 34th | Malta | 91.44 | -2.2% |
| 35th | Togo | 91.49 | 1.9% |
| 36th | Latvia | 91.54 | -1.1% |
| 37th | Cyprus | 92.11 | -5.7% |
| 38th | Norway | 92.58 | -19.8% |
| 39th | India | 92.83 | 2.2% |
| 40th | Croatia | 93.02 | -2.3% |
| 41st | Ghana | 93.35 | 8.5% |
| 42nd | Belgium | 93.64 | 2.6% |
| 43rd | Peru | 93.68 | 3.9% |
| 44th | Luxembourg | 93.69 | -0.1% |
| 45th | Denmark | 93.73 | 1.6% |
| 46th | Guyana | 94.47 | 0.3% |
| 47th | Italy | 94.50 | -4.2% |
| 48th | Switzerland | 94.70 | 11.0% |
| 49th | Netherlands | 95.10 | 4.0% |
| 50th | Portugal | 95.40 | -0.5% |
| 51st | Costa Rica | 95.85 | 4.0% |
| 52nd | Chile | 95.92 | -20.4% |
| 53rd | Gabon | 96.35 | 0.1% |
| 54th | China | 96.77 | 29.5% |
| 55th | France | 96.78 | -5.8% |
| 56th | Cameroon | 96.83 | 3.4% |
| 57th | Slovenia | 97.73 | 0.4% |
| 58th | Paraguay | 98.02 | -3.7% |
| 59th | Pakistan | 98.08 | -9.1% |
| 60th | Korea | 98.47 | -3.4% |
| 61st | Austria | 98.49 | 3.3% |
| 62nd | Singapore | 99.02 | 6.4% |
| 63rd | Germany | 99.73 | -3.1% |
| 64th | Finland | 100.65 | -0.3% |
| 65th | Sweden | 101.93 | -19.1% |
| 66th | North Macedonia | 103.15 | 10.2% |
| 67th | Poland | 103.18 | 4.7% |
| 68th | Malaysia | 103.34 | -9.9% |
| 69th | Fiji | 107.48 | 1.3% |
| 70th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 107.74 | 1.3% |
| 71st | Ukraine | 108.14 | 10.6% |
| 72nd | Dominican Republic | 108.24 | 4.6% |
| 73rd | Morocco | 110.21 | -1.2% |
| 74th | Nicaragua | 110.30 | 0.3% |
| 75th | Uruguay | 110.59 | -2.4% |
| 76th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 111.09 | 8.2% |
| 77th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 111.12 | -1.7% |
| 78th | Israel | 111.49 | 10.8% |
| 79th | Japan | 111.77 | -31.0% |
| 80th | Grenada | 112.47 | 0.5% |
| 81st | Uganda | 114.10 | -2.5% |
| 82nd | Belize | 115.24 | 0.9% |
| 83rd | St. Lucia | 116.76 | 4.6% |
| 84th | Antigua and Barbuda | 116.98 | 2.0% |
| 85th | Türkiye | 118.03 | -18.8% |
| 86th | Burundi | 118.73 | -4.1% |
| 87th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 119.07 | 1.2% |
| 88th | Iceland | 120.24 | 6.2% |
| 89th | Bahamas, The | 120.49 | 2.9% |
| 90th | Dominica | 122.00 | 1.3% |
| 91st | Solomon Islands | 122.40 | 7.9% |
| 92nd | Mexico | 123.04 | -18.1% |
| 93rd | Algeria | 123.28 | -6.4% |
| 94th | Lesotho | 123.29 | -13.7% |
| 95th | United States | 126.23 | 25.2% |
| 96th | Saudi Arabia | 126.87 | 26.0% |
| 97th | United Kingdom | 127.28 | -3.1% |
| 98th | Tunisia | 128.97 | -1.6% |
| 99th | Bahrain | 133.14 | 3.0% |
| 100th | Sierra Leone | 142.84 | 9.1% |
| 101st | Malawi | 145.09 | 8.1% |
| 102nd | Hong Kong SAR, China | 151.90 | 32.7% |
| 103rd | Gambia, The | 158.54 | -13.6% |
| 104th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 245.92 | -51.9% |
| 105th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 296.22 | 13.7% |
| 106th | Argentina | 498.67 | 4.9% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2001?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2001 was 151.90. This ranked 102nd globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2001?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 32.7% in 2001 compared to 2000.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2001?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2001 at 498.67.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2001?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2001 was 151.90. This ranked 102nd globally.
How does 2001 compare to 2000 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 146.69 in 2000 to 151.90 in 2001, a 32.7% increase.
Related
2000
2002
All years
Full ranking 2001
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking