Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2003
129.15
+18.69 from 2002
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 129.15 in 2003, increased +18.69 from 145.64 in 2002. This was the 103rd highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2003▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Brazil | 57.58 | -37.5% |
| 2nd | Zambia | 61.92 | -11.5% |
| 3rd | Moldova | 67.87 | -5.4% |
| 4th | Armenia | 67.94 | -7.9% |
| 5th | Slovak Republic | 68.30 | 15.2% |
| 6th | Russian Federation | 68.83 | -19.8% |
| 7th | Colombia | 68.96 | -32.9% |
| 8th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 70.54 | -37.2% |
| 9th | Uruguay | 73.59 | -21.7% |
| 10th | Nigeria | 73.67 | -6.1% |
| 11th | Thailand | 77.12 | -2.1% |
| 12th | Trinidad and Tobago | 77.38 | -1.7% |
| 13th | Georgia | 78.03 | -5.9% |
| 14th | Czechia | 78.03 | -0.9% |
| 15th | Bulgaria | 78.92 | 8.5% |
| 16th | Australia | 79.37 | -5.7% |
| 17th | Philippines | 79.40 | 4.5% |
| 18th | Paraguay | 79.60 | -6.5% |
| 19th | Dominican Republic | 79.92 | -24.4% |
| 20th | Samoa | 80.47 | -1.0% |
| 21st | Canada | 80.96 | -11.3% |
| 22nd | Romania | 81.10 | -3.9% |
| 23rd | Estonia | 81.50 | 3.4% |
| 24th | Equatorial Guinea | 82.36 | 17.1% |
| 25th | United Arab Emirates | 82.59 | -7.6% |
| 26th | Serbia | 84.03 | 4.3% |
| 27th | Burundi | 84.46 | -18.3% |
| 28th | Latvia | 85.02 | -2.4% |
| 29th | Lithuania | 85.32 | 1.4% |
| 30th | Papua New Guinea | 85.54 | 10.8% |
| 31st | Chile | 86.21 | -18.4% |
| 32nd | Costa Rica | 87.56 | -6.5% |
| 33rd | China | 88.38 | 16.1% |
| 34th | Poland | 88.45 | -17.2% |
| 35th | Solomon Islands | 89.14 | -12.8% |
| 36th | Hungary | 89.16 | -11.8% |
| 37th | India | 89.42 | -0.2% |
| 38th | Ghana | 91.03 | 2.8% |
| 39th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 91.04 | -17.5% |
| 40th | Peru | 91.99 | -3.0% |
| 41st | Guyana | 92.29 | -3.4% |
| 42nd | Singapore | 93.06 | 2.2% |
| 43rd | New Zealand | 93.80 | 12.5% |
| 44th | Indonesia | 94.46 | 7.2% |
| 45th | Croatia | 94.55 | -5.0% |
| 46th | Greece | 94.71 | -5.8% |
| 47th | Gambia, The | 95.26 | -27.6% |
| 48th | Ukraine | 95.49 | -8.1% |
| 49th | Israel | 95.74 | 5.9% |
| 50th | Uganda | 95.82 | -12.2% |
| 51st | Spain | 96.77 | 1.5% |
| 52nd | Central African Republic | 97.18 | 6.6% |
| 53rd | Malaysia | 97.89 | -19.2% |
| 54th | Togo | 98.27 | 3.6% |
| 55th | Luxembourg | 98.37 | 3.5% |
| 56th | Switzerland | 98.38 | 8.3% |
| 57th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 98.57 | -10.0% |
| 58th | South Africa | 98.83 | 0.1% |
| 59th | Pakistan | 98.84 | -2.7% |
| 60th | Malta | 98.91 | 2.4% |
| 61st | Ireland | 99.02 | -2.3% |
| 62nd | Côte d'Ivoire | 99.68 | 6.9% |
| 63rd | Belgium | 99.72 | 7.2% |
| 64th | Norway | 99.97 | -22.7% |
| 65th | Denmark | 100.51 | 5.6% |
| 66th | Nicaragua | 100.72 | -6.4% |
| 67th | Gabon | 100.92 | 4.9% |
| 68th | Cyprus | 101.52 | -0.6% |
| 69th | Slovenia | 101.78 | 2.2% |
| 70th | Sierra Leone | 102.10 | -17.3% |
| 71st | Portugal | 102.21 | 1.8% |
| 72nd | Austria | 102.80 | 7.0% |
| 73rd | Italy | 102.89 | 0.9% |
| 74th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 102.97 | -3.9% |
| 75th | Algeria | 103.01 | -18.2% |
| 76th | Korea | 103.11 | 2.1% |
| 77th | Cameroon | 103.54 | 3.2% |
| 78th | France | 103.77 | -0.3% |
| 79th | Netherlands | 104.37 | 7.2% |
| 80th | North Macedonia | 104.53 | 2.7% |
| 81st | Japan | 105.05 | -22.3% |
| 82nd | Grenada | 106.13 | -4.0% |
| 83rd | Germany | 106.15 | 2.0% |
| 84th | Finland | 107.08 | 3.6% |
| 85th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 108.12 | -7.3% |
| 86th | St. Lucia | 108.14 | -4.7% |
| 87th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 108.56 | 0.5% |
| 88th | Morocco | 108.89 | 1.9% |
| 89th | Mexico | 110.21 | -31.8% |
| 90th | Malawi | 110.62 | -30.1% |
| 91st | Lesotho | 111.16 | 43.6% |
| 92nd | Sweden | 111.62 | -6.3% |
| 93rd | Belize | 111.90 | -2.4% |
| 94th | Saudi Arabia | 112.74 | 13.5% |
| 95th | Bahamas, The | 113.04 | -5.1% |
| 96th | Antigua and Barbuda | 114.07 | -3.1% |
| 97th | Fiji | 115.18 | 6.9% |
| 98th | Dominica | 117.60 | -2.2% |
| 99th | United States | 118.00 | 10.9% |
| 100th | Tunisia | 121.31 | -4.9% |
| 101st | United Kingdom | 122.95 | -4.6% |
| 102nd | Bahrain | 125.68 | -7.8% |
| 103rd | Hong Kong SAR, China | 129.15 | 16.9% |
| 104th | Iceland | 135.96 | 30.0% |
| 105th | Türkiye | 141.13 | 9.1% |
| 106th | Argentina | 227.36 | 0.6% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2003?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2003 was 129.15. This ranked 103rd globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2003?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 16.9% in 2003 compared to 2002.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2003?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2003 at 227.36.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2003?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2003 was 129.15. This ranked 103rd globally.
How does 2003 compare to 2002 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 145.64 in 2002 to 129.15 in 2003, a 16.9% increase.
Related
2002
2004
All years
Full ranking 2003
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking