Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2004
116.10
+15.95 from 2003
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 116.10 in 2004, increased +15.95 from 129.15 in 2003. This was the 99th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2004▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Brazil | 60.45 | -32.4% |
| 2nd | Zambia | 65.11 | 5.2% |
| 3rd | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 70.30 | -0.4% |
| 4th | Armenia | 71.65 | 5.5% |
| 5th | Uruguay | 72.46 | -1.5% |
| 6th | Russian Federation | 74.36 | -14.7% |
| 7th | Slovak Republic | 74.79 | 11.4% |
| 8th | Colombia | 75.22 | -15.6% |
| 9th | Nigeria | 75.31 | 2.2% |
| 10th | Trinidad and Tobago | 76.00 | -1.8% |
| 11th | Philippines | 76.02 | 10.0% |
| 12th | Thailand | 76.80 | -0.4% |
| 13th | Moldova | 77.68 | 14.5% |
| 14th | Czechia | 78.79 | 0.9% |
| 15th | Dominican Republic | 79.96 | 0.1% |
| 16th | United Arab Emirates | 79.97 | -3.2% |
| 17th | Burundi | 81.34 | -3.7% |
| 18th | Paraguay | 82.05 | 3.1% |
| 19th | Serbia | 82.74 | -1.5% |
| 20th | Bulgaria | 82.77 | 10.7% |
| 21st | Romania | 82.87 | 0.7% |
| 22nd | Estonia | 83.31 | 2.2% |
| 23rd | Georgia | 83.35 | 6.8% |
| 24th | Costa Rica | 84.81 | -3.1% |
| 25th | Lithuania | 85.13 | -0.2% |
| 26th | Australia | 85.42 | -9.6% |
| 27th | Canada | 85.44 | -15.3% |
| 28th | Latvia | 85.76 | 4.2% |
| 29th | China | 85.85 | 21.4% |
| 30th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 86.97 | -4.5% |
| 31st | Solomon Islands | 87.31 | -2.1% |
| 32nd | Poland | 87.48 | -8.8% |
| 33rd | Equatorial Guinea | 87.94 | 6.8% |
| 34th | Guyana | 88.15 | -4.5% |
| 35th | Papua New Guinea | 88.37 | 3.3% |
| 36th | Samoa | 89.81 | 11.6% |
| 37th | Israel | 89.86 | 5.2% |
| 38th | Indonesia | 90.17 | -4.5% |
| 39th | India | 90.32 | 1.0% |
| 40th | Peru | 90.58 | -1.5% |
| 41st | Chile | 91.03 | -8.4% |
| 42nd | Sierra Leone | 91.35 | -10.5% |
| 43rd | Singapore | 92.02 | 5.1% |
| 44th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 92.14 | -6.5% |
| 45th | Malaysia | 93.48 | -18.2% |
| 46th | Ukraine | 93.53 | -2.1% |
| 47th | Gambia, The | 93.82 | -1.5% |
| 48th | Ghana | 94.17 | 3.4% |
| 49th | Central African Republic | 94.21 | -3.1% |
| 50th | Hungary | 94.88 | -9.1% |
| 51st | Croatia | 95.69 | -3.8% |
| 52nd | Norway | 95.81 | -25.3% |
| 53rd | Greece | 96.30 | -9.4% |
| 54th | Nicaragua | 96.94 | -3.8% |
| 55th | Switzerland | 97.36 | 6.6% |
| 56th | Pakistan | 98.02 | -0.8% |
| 57th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 98.66 | -4.2% |
| 58th | Malawi | 98.70 | -10.8% |
| 59th | Spain | 98.70 | -1.3% |
| 60th | Togo | 99.04 | 0.8% |
| 61st | Uganda | 99.42 | 3.8% |
| 62nd | Luxembourg | 99.42 | 2.0% |
| 63rd | New Zealand | 100.25 | 5.5% |
| 64th | Gabon | 100.90 | 0.0% |
| 65th | Côte d'Ivoire | 100.92 | 1.2% |
| 66th | Belgium | 101.31 | 4.5% |
| 67th | Denmark | 101.40 | 2.5% |
| 68th | Slovenia | 101.46 | -0.3% |
| 69th | Ireland | 101.85 | -8.7% |
| 70th | Grenada | 102.27 | -3.6% |
| 71st | Malta | 102.80 | 3.8% |
| 72nd | Cameroon | 102.89 | -0.6% |
| 73rd | St. Lucia | 102.96 | -4.8% |
| 74th | North Macedonia | 103.01 | -0.1% |
| 75th | Cyprus | 103.02 | -5.0% |
| 76th | Portugal | 103.23 | -0.8% |
| 77th | Algeria | 103.44 | -9.6% |
| 78th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 103.47 | -4.3% |
| 79th | Austria | 103.92 | 5.1% |
| 80th | Italy | 104.64 | -2.9% |
| 81st | South Africa | 104.76 | -19.3% |
| 82nd | Saudi Arabia | 104.85 | 16.7% |
| 83rd | Netherlands | 105.31 | 1.7% |
| 84th | France | 105.54 | -3.5% |
| 85th | Bahamas, The | 105.98 | -6.2% |
| 86th | Mexico | 105.98 | -26.1% |
| 87th | Japan | 106.08 | -21.8% |
| 88th | Morocco | 106.99 | 0.7% |
| 89th | Finland | 107.02 | -0.8% |
| 90th | Korea | 107.24 | 5.4% |
| 91st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 107.38 | -1.1% |
| 92nd | Germany | 107.65 | -1.4% |
| 93rd | Belize | 108.41 | -3.1% |
| 94th | Antigua and Barbuda | 110.94 | -2.7% |
| 95th | Sweden | 112.18 | -11.4% |
| 96th | United States | 112.40 | 12.6% |
| 97th | Dominica | 112.87 | -4.0% |
| 98th | Bahrain | 114.93 | -8.6% |
| 99th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 116.10 | 15.9% |
| 100th | Tunisia | 116.75 | -3.8% |
| 101st | Fiji | 117.41 | 1.9% |
| 102nd | United Kingdom | 127.77 | 3.5% |
| 103rd | Lesotho | 128.70 | 15.8% |
| 104th | Iceland | 140.06 | 27.6% |
| 105th | Türkiye | 145.69 | 3.2% |
| 106th | Argentina | 218.65 | -3.8% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2004?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2004 was 116.10. This ranked 99th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2004?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 15.9% in 2004 compared to 2003.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2004?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2004 at 218.65.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2004?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2004 was 116.10. This ranked 99th globally.
How does 2004 compare to 2003 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 129.15 in 2003 to 116.10 in 2004, a 15.9% increase.
Related
2003
2005
All years
Full ranking 2004
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking