Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2014
112.44
+28.91 from 2013
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 112.44 in 2014, increased +28.91 from 109.45 in 2013. This was the 93rd highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2014▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Ghana | 69.47 | -21.5% |
| 2nd | Malawi | 70.65 | 8.1% |
| 3rd | Gambia, The | 73.60 | -9.7% |
| 4th | Japan | 74.59 | -27.3% |
| 5th | Ukraine | 76.99 | -21.5% |
| 6th | South Africa | 77.10 | -33.9% |
| 7th | Lesotho | 81.53 | -5.6% |
| 8th | Brazil | 84.59 | -43.7% |
| 9th | India | 89.62 | 1.5% |
| 10th | United Arab Emirates | 90.83 | 1.9% |
| 11th | Czechia | 90.86 | -6.0% |
| 12th | Canada | 91.52 | -24.0% |
| 13th | Dominican Republic | 91.69 | -2.0% |
| 14th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 91.86 | -25.6% |
| 15th | Chile | 91.87 | -23.4% |
| 16th | Hungary | 92.13 | -18.1% |
| 17th | Thailand | 93.11 | -2.9% |
| 18th | Norway | 93.19 | -25.3% |
| 19th | Tunisia | 93.48 | -0.1% |
| 20th | Grenada | 93.61 | -3.0% |
| 21st | Serbia | 93.81 | -1.1% |
| 22nd | Dominica | 94.09 | -0.4% |
| 23rd | Lithuania | 94.61 | 0.7% |
| 24th | Greece | 94.85 | -13.2% |
| 25th | Croatia | 95.82 | -7.1% |
| 26th | Colombia | 95.88 | -31.0% |
| 27th | Indonesia | 96.28 | -6.4% |
| 28th | Belize | 96.44 | 1.0% |
| 29th | Estonia | 96.47 | 0.8% |
| 30th | Malta | 96.49 | -4.9% |
| 31st | Ireland | 96.54 | -12.2% |
| 32nd | Cyprus | 96.59 | -10.1% |
| 33rd | Poland | 96.86 | -7.2% |
| 34th | Morocco | 97.08 | 1.2% |
| 35th | France | 97.35 | -5.2% |
| 36th | Nicaragua | 97.35 | 0.1% |
| 37th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 97.96 | -0.6% |
| 38th | Malaysia | 97.96 | -16.1% |
| 39th | Russian Federation | 98.12 | -29.1% |
| 40th | Germany | 98.27 | -2.5% |
| 41st | Australia | 98.34 | -19.7% |
| 42nd | Peru | 98.42 | -1.3% |
| 43rd | Zambia | 98.43 | -4.5% |
| 44th | Denmark | 98.45 | -1.8% |
| 45th | Portugal | 98.47 | -3.6% |
| 46th | Guyana | 98.49 | -0.7% |
| 47th | Bahrain | 98.92 | 1.3% |
| 48th | Bahamas, The | 99.03 | 0.3% |
| 49th | United States | 99.20 | 20.6% |
| 50th | Spain | 99.25 | -4.0% |
| 51st | Gabon | 99.27 | 3.6% |
| 52nd | Italy | 99.34 | -4.9% |
| 53rd | Togo | 99.45 | 1.3% |
| 54th | Cameroon | 99.75 | 0.8% |
| 55th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 99.84 | -0.6% |
| 56th | Latvia | 99.91 | 5.3% |
| 57th | Belgium | 99.95 | 1.0% |
| 58th | Bulgaria | 100.18 | 5.2% |
| 59th | Antigua and Barbuda | 100.31 | 0.3% |
| 60th | Netherlands | 100.35 | 1.4% |
| 61st | Finland | 100.56 | -0.1% |
| 62nd | Côte d'Ivoire | 100.70 | 0.2% |
| 63rd | Sweden | 100.78 | -16.5% |
| 64th | Luxembourg | 100.79 | -0.1% |
| 65th | Armenia | 100.98 | 4.3% |
| 66th | Mexico | 101.14 | -23.1% |
| 67th | Slovenia | 101.32 | 0.0% |
| 68th | Slovak Republic | 101.37 | 1.9% |
| 69th | Samoa | 101.47 | -1.3% |
| 70th | North Macedonia | 101.70 | 0.3% |
| 71st | Austria | 101.82 | 4.8% |
| 72nd | Romania | 101.82 | -0.9% |
| 73rd | Moldova | 102.67 | -3.8% |
| 74th | St. Lucia | 102.85 | 2.3% |
| 75th | Algeria | 102.92 | -7.1% |
| 76th | Israel | 103.18 | 13.7% |
| 77th | Saudi Arabia | 103.80 | 17.0% |
| 78th | Fiji | 103.87 | -1.7% |
| 79th | Switzerland | 104.26 | 9.2% |
| 80th | Burundi | 104.33 | 3.7% |
| 81st | Philippines | 106.32 | 11.0% |
| 82nd | Georgia | 106.42 | -0.8% |
| 83rd | Costa Rica | 106.42 | -3.7% |
| 84th | Equatorial Guinea | 106.74 | 4.0% |
| 85th | Uruguay | 106.82 | -3.8% |
| 86th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 107.05 | -1.1% |
| 87th | Uganda | 107.72 | 1.6% |
| 88th | Pakistan | 107.82 | 6.9% |
| 89th | United Kingdom | 108.73 | 5.1% |
| 90th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 109.46 | 1.3% |
| 91st | Iceland | 111.11 | 29.0% |
| 92nd | Singapore | 111.36 | 4.0% |
| 93rd | Hong Kong SAR, China | 112.44 | 34.6% |
| 94th | New Zealand | 112.96 | 3.1% |
| 95th | Trinidad and Tobago | 117.23 | 5.4% |
| 96th | Paraguay | 117.57 | 1.9% |
| 97th | China | 118.36 | 27.5% |
| 98th | Central African Republic | 119.87 | 14.0% |
| 99th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 120.13 | 7.0% |
| 100th | Papua New Guinea | 122.78 | -3.3% |
| 101st | Solomon Islands | 124.55 | 5.1% |
| 102nd | Nigeria | 124.84 | 6.2% |
| 103rd | Sierra Leone | 131.79 | 3.9% |
| 104th | Argentina | 134.33 | -17.6% |
| 105th | Korea | 134.52 | 37.5% |
| 106th | Türkiye | 153.37 | -5.7% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2014?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2014 was 112.44. This ranked 93rd globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2014?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 34.6% in 2014 compared to 2013.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2014?▾
Türkiye had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2014 at 153.37.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2014?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2014 was 112.44. This ranked 93rd globally.
How does 2014 compare to 2013 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 109.45 in 2013 to 112.44 in 2014, a 34.6% increase.
Related
2013
2015
All years
Full ranking 2014
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking